Abstract:
Background: A well functioning drug supply management (DSM) is the corner stone for
any meaningful health service. However, Pharmaceutical supply systems in many
developing countries have severe problems, including inefficient selection, procurement
and use of drugs. The magnitude and extent of the problem is huge and chronic in the
Ethiopian health care system for a long time.
Objective: The objective was to evaluate the drug supply management process in three
public health centers (HCs) in Jimma town special zone.
Evaluation Methodology: The focus of the evaluation was the process of the program
with formative approach. The evaluation design was facility based cross sectional study
with both quantitative and qualitative methods. The evaluation dimensions included
assessment of availability of resources, compliance of the services provided with the
standard manuals\guidelines and accommodation. Totally 23 indicators were used. For
determination of prescription pattern, simple random sampling was used to select the
minimum 600 prescriptions recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) for
facility based cross sectional studies, form the past six months of July 8, 2010 to January
8, 2011 to consider seasonal variations. For Patient care practice, 418 (calculated 380
and 38 added for 10% compensation for non response rate) outpatients were selected
conveniently for exit interview by using Epi Info Version 6 at 50% prevalence, 95%
confidence interval and 5% margin of error based on past six month‘s 31,579 patient
flow in the three health centers. For observation of consulting and dispensing time the
calculated 380 samples (for each) were selected from the three health centers,
respectively. Quantitative descriptive data analysis that generates frequency and
calculated mean and median of the indicators as per the matrix of analysis and judgment
was made using SPSS version 16.0 software and MS excel. The qualitative data was
analyzed component by component thematically and the result was presented in narrative
form to explain quantitative results. Results: In the special zone, percentage availability of the 13 selected essential drugs
was 10.7(82.0%) and there were no expired drugs found on their shelves. The availability
of 15 of the required 16(93.3%) professionals was adequate according the Business
Process Reengineering (BPR). The average lead time was found to be less than five days
and adequacy of conservation conditions and handling of drugs was 6.8 of 10 criteria
(67.5%). The average consultation time and dispensing time were 5:43 minutes and 1:17
minutes, respectively. The average number of drugs per prescription was 2.0. The high
percentage of patients prescribed antibiotics 394(65.7%) may indicate the overuse of
these drugs, whereas the 59(9.8%) prescribed injections showed rational use. The
1154(97.9%) of drugs prescribed by generic name and 1175(99.7%) of prescribed drugs
on Essential Drug List indicates prescribers‘ adherence to Essential Drug List.
Conclusion: This evaluation revealed that (based on the pre-set judgment criteria) the
achievement of the selected essential drug supply management in Jimma town special
zone was medium 70.3% (achieved 211 of 300 weight given), i.e. were not yet at optimal
level and needs improvement. Areas for improvement identified were: the Standard
Treatment Guidelines (STGs) and Essential Drug List (EDL) should be available in all
health centers. Pre- and in-service training for all health workers involved in drug supply
management to improve on the medium consultation time, poor record keeping and the
extremely poor labeling of drugs.